Back to Feed
GDPRJun 30, 2026

UODO (Poland) - DKN.5131.7.2022

Poland's DPA fined a sub-processor €2,415 for data security violations.

Poland's Data Protection Authority (UODO) fined a sub-processor €2,415 for failing to implement adequate technical and organizational measures. Former employees retained access to customer personal data shared via an app, violating GDPR principles of integrity, confidentiality, and accountability. The controller also received a reprimand for insufficient oversight of its processors.

AI summary of the linked source. Not reviewed by an editor. How this works

Vendor Watch

Run UODO?

Get an email when a new story names UODO, usually within the hour.

Free. Your list stays private and never appears in a subject line. One click stops it. How Vendor Watch worksPrivacy

The lesson from this incident

Full lesson

The core failure in this case was the absence of a reliable offboarding process to revoke former employees' access to systems containing customer personal data. By allowing ex-staff to retain access through a shared application, the sub-processor directly violated GDPR principles of integrity, confidentiality, and accountability. This incident also highlights the controller's responsibility to actively oversee its processors — not merely sign data processing agreements and step back. Supply chain data governance is a two-way obligation: controllers must audit processor compliance, and processors must enforce internal controls rigorously. Regulators are increasingly holding the entire data processing chain accountable, meaning a weak link at the sub-processor level can trigger fines and reputational damage across the chain.

What helps against this

How we list vendors

Entities

UODO (vendor)