Back to Feed
PolicyOct 5, 2026

High Court - 2026 IEHC 640

Irish High Court rules on GDPR burden of proof in ICCL v Microsoft Ireland case.

The Irish High Court has ruled on preliminary questions regarding the burden of proof in a representative action brought by the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) against Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited. The case concerns allegations that Microsoft's Xandr real-time bidding platform infringes GDPR requirements. The court clarified that while GDPR does not generally reverse the burden of proof, once a claimant establishes that a controller is processing data in a way that engages GDPR obligations, the controller must then demonstrate compliance.

AI summary of the linked source. Not reviewed by an editor. How this works

Vendor Watch

Run Microsoft?

Get an email when a new story names Microsoft, usually within the hour.

Free. Your list stays private and never appears in a subject line. One click stops it. How Vendor Watch worksPrivacy

The lesson from this incident

Full lesson

The Irish High Court's ruling clarifies that once a data subject or representative body demonstrates that a controller is processing personal data in a way that engages GDPR obligations, the burden shifts to the controller to prove compliance — not the other way around. Microsoft's Xandr real-time bidding platform is alleged to have violated GDPR by sharing personal data with thousands of advertisers without adequate legal basis or transparency. This case highlights that ad-tech ecosystems, which rely on mass automated data sharing, carry significant regulatory exposure that organisations often underestimate. The ruling matters broadly because it makes it operationally harder for controllers to rely on procedural ambiguity as a defence, effectively raising the bar for demonstrable compliance across all data processing activities.

What helps against this

How we list vendors

Entities

Microsoft (vendor)Xandr (product)