Back to Feed
VulnerabilitiesSep 19, 2026

Claude Opus 5 Helped Researchers Take Over OpenAI Staff Accounts via Chained Flaws

Researchers used Claude Opus 5 to chain flaws, gaining access to OpenAI staff accounts and code repositories.

Security researchers leveraged Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to chain two vulnerabilities, one in OpenAI's public help forum software (Discourse, specifically libheif) and another in OpenAI's own login system. This allowed them to access several OpenAI employee accounts for ChatGPT and Codex, and subsequently reach an internal code repository. The researchers reported the findings to OpenAI, who confirmed the fix and awarded a $6,500 bounty.

AI summary of the linked source. Not reviewed by an editor. How this works

Vendor Watch

Run Anthropic?

Get an email when a new story names Anthropic, usually within the hour.

Free. Your list stays private and never appears in a subject line. One click stops it. How Vendor Watch worksPrivacy

The lesson from this incident

Full lesson

Researchers exploited two distinct vulnerabilities in sequence — a flaw in the libheif library used by OpenAI's Discourse-based help forum, combined with a weakness in OpenAI's own authentication system — to gain unauthorized access to employee accounts and an internal code repository. This attack demonstrates the danger of vulnerability chaining, where individually moderate flaws become critical when combined. Third-party software components (like libheif embedded in Discourse) expand an organization's attack surface in ways that are easy to overlook. The incident underscores that public-facing support and community platforms are not low-risk assets — they can serve as pivot points into core internal systems.

What helps against this

How we list vendors

Indicators of Compromise

Extracted by AI from the linked source. Not reviewed by an editor. How this works

  • cve — CVE-2026-32882

Entities

Claude Opus 5 (product)Anthropic (vendor)ChatGPT (product)Codex (product)OpenAI (vendor)Discourse (product)