[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fTzq5wa_7mXu6mSztBEXZ9P9jec593XaQaT3520_Rfcg":3},{"article":4,"iocs":40,"watch_terms":41,"solutions":42,"lesson":45},{"id":5,"title":6,"slug":7,"summary":8,"ai_summary":9,"brief":10,"url":11,"image_url":12,"published_at":13,"ingested_at":14,"relevance_score":15,"entities":16,"category_id":17,"category":18,"article_tags":22},"e0d12d71-e760-470e-b754-8761d0b7b41a","The County Prosecutors Who Became ICE Informants","the-county-prosecutors-who-became-ice-informants-e32b92","Illinois prosecutors shared defendants’ personal data with federal immigration agents without criminal warrants, public disclosure, or legislative oversight.","Illinois prosecutors have been sharing personal data of defendants with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) without criminal warrants, public disclosure, or legislative oversight. This collaboration, revealed through emails reviewed by Injustice Watch, occurred across 1 out of 6 Illinois counties and involved various levels of staff, raising questions about the effectiveness of the state's TRUST Act in protecting immigrants from federal deportation efforts.","Illinois prosecutors shared defendant data with ICE without warrants or oversight.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Fstory\u002Fthe-county-prosecutors-who-became-ice-informants\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fmedia.wired.com\u002Fphotos\u002F6a870dcaebe7f306d0053666\u002Fmaster\u002Fpass\u002FSAO_2.jpg","2026-08-25T11:00:00+00:00","2026-08-25T12:00:10.888041+00:00",7,[],"c5c77cdb-f7d7-4990-9436-c81dcbff1163",{"id":17,"icon":19,"name":20,"slug":21},null,"Policy","policy",[23,28,33,38],{"category":24},{"id":25,"icon":19,"name":26,"slug":27},"2e06f76c-d5b9-4f54-9eef-4d3447b10730","Breaches","breaches",{"category":29},{"id":30,"icon":19,"name":31,"slug":32},"614132b8-5837-4952-b8b5-c6c9a32a1d85","Privacy","privacy",{"category":34},{"id":35,"icon":19,"name":36,"slug":37},"6cbdd207-aaa1-4176-9534-e156b125e917","Nation-state","nation-state",{"category":39},{"id":17,"icon":19,"name":20,"slug":21},[],[],{"controls":43,"vendors":44},[],[],{"slug":46,"title":47,"body":48,"framework_refs":49,"framework_notes":63},"illinois-prosecutors-shared-defendant-data-with-ice-without-warrants-or-oversight","Illinois Prosecutors Shared Defendant Data with ICE Without Warrants or Oversight","County prosecutors in Illinois shared personal data of defendants with ICE without criminal warrants, public disclosure, or legislative oversight, effectively bypassing the state's TRUST Act protections. The root cause is a failure of data governance and regulatory compliance — staff at multiple levels had the ability and willingness to share sensitive personal data without proper authorization frameworks in place. This matters because individuals' immigration status, personal records, and legal proceedings constitute highly sensitive data that carries life-altering consequences when mishandled. The lack of logging, oversight, and clear data-sharing policies meant this practice went undetected and unchallenged for an extended period, demonstrating that compliance laws alone are insufficient without enforcement mechanisms.",[50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62],"NIST SP 800-53 AC-2 (Account Management)","NIST SP 800-53 AC-3 (Access Enforcement)","NIST SP 800-53 AU-2 (Audit Events)","NIST SP 800-53 AU-12 (Audit Record Generation)","NIST SP 800-53 PM-25 (Minimization of Personally Identifiable Information)","NIST Privacy Framework PR.PO-P1 (Policies and procedures for data governance)","CIS Control 3: Data Protection","CIS Control 6: Access Control Management","CIS Control 8: Audit Log Management","GDPR Article 5 (Principles relating to processing of personal data)","GDPR Article 25 (Data Protection by Design and by Default)","Illinois TRUST Act (Public Act 100-0463)","ITIL Service Design — Information Security Management",{}]